On Crime Dramas…

January 24, 2005 | Rants and Raves, Science | By: Mark VandeWettering

I watch a fair number of crime drama shows. Early on, I really liked CSI. It had some fairly interesting characters, and tried to present some interesting bits of forensics in a stylized dramatic way. But now that it has branched off into three different shows, it simply makes me wince.

The problem is a basic one of belivability. Yes, it’s just a TV show, I understand. But it has to be even roughly plausible or the sense of drama is destroyed. It is supposed to tease you with its plausibility, not surprise you with its absurdity.

For instance, in CSI they’ve taken to using various kinds of image manipulation to find out key bits of evidence. The simple fact is that the kind of image manipulation they do is impossible. You can’t pull an image of someone’s face reflecting in someone’s eye from a security camera image from a distance of thirty feet, or even five feet. It simply can’t be done. There is not 45% overscan in video images. And don’t get started with what they pretend to be able to do with encrypted files and the like.

It is with this feeling of trepidation that I watched the first episode of NUMB3RS. The basic idea is kind of interesting: a math prodigy teams with an FBI investigator to use mathematics to help solve crimes. Surprisingly, the pilot episode didn’t make me cringe excessively, but I can’t help but think that sooner or later they will be jumping the shark in every episode. It’s just too difficult to come up with real ideas that are remotely plausible. Soon, I suspect they will be resorting to simple magic to “poof”, solve crimes.

We shall see…

Comments

Comment from D’Arcy Norman
Time 1/25/2005 at 9:21 am

CSI is entertaining – as long as you can suspend disbelief. For a while, I thought American lab techs could actually kick down doors without warrants, and interview suspects without a lawyer (or, you know, a police officer) present. Oh, yeah… And the whole technology thing. “We extrapolated the suspect’s DNA from a blurry security camera tape…” If that hasn’t made its way into CSI: Hoboken, it will by the end of the year…

Comment from mneptok
Time 1/25/2005 at 6:13 pm

CSI. Where you use a flashlight to illuminate everything instead of just turning of the frackin’ lights. Not to mention every interioris dimly lit, even your workspace while examining evidence. Even though someone apparently spent millions on the crime lab, they forgot lighting.

Not to mention you can sequence DNA and get mass spectrometer results in a few minutes. Guess the power for the lighting grid is being used by the as-yet-to-be-invented 15 minute mass spec.

They don’t want me to suspend disbelief. They want me to just stop thinking, sit there and eat nachos.

“The CSI franchise perfectly fulfills the viewing needs of a fat, lazy nation: no running, no car chases, just sitting around, talking, and playing with gadgets.” –