Was Hank Aaron really that good?
My son innocently asked “was Hank Aaron really that good?” while they were flashing stats showing how various active players might have a shot at Aaron’s home run record. I said “yes, he really was”, and then ran a quick database query that produced the following career numbers:
Hank Aaron|116.863636363636 Stan Musial|104.556818181818 Willie Mays|103.397727272727 Ty Cobb|99.7840909090909 Babe Ruth|98.7443181818182 Barry Bonds|98.5909090909091 Pete Rose|98.0454545454546 Carl Yastrzemski|94.4147727272727 Eddie Murray|91.9943181818182 Rafael Palmeiro|91.8409090909091 Frank Robinson|91.5852272727273 Dave Winfield|88.9943181818182 Cal Ripken|88.0909090909091 Tris Speaker|86.9488636363636 Lou Gehrig|86.25 George Brett|85.9772727272727 Mel Ott|85.9261363636364 Jimmie Foxx|84.4772727272727 Ted Williams|83.25 Honus Wagner|82.875
The number associated with each name if the total bases by each player expressed in miles. Aaron had more than twelve miles more career total bases than the next in line. Bonds has no chance of beating that record.
[tags]Baseball, Fun with Databases[/tags]
I suspect the world would be better if that percentage were even greater.
Apparently 15% of all web traffic is cat related. There's no reason for Brainwagon be any different.
Thanks Mal! I'm trying to reclaim the time that I was using doom scrolling and writing pointless political diatribes on…
Brainwagons back! I can't help you with a job, not least because I'm on the other side of our little…
Congrats, glad to hear all is well.