Milhouse vs. the iPhone
I woke up at 5:30 or so this morning, and couldn’t get back to bed, so I thought some more tinkering with Milhouse was warranted. Musing about yesterday’s reading, I realized that I had a bit more work to really try it out: I’d need to write a code to handle regression learning. That seemed like too much, so I thought I’d play a quick game against Optime software’s Checkers Free for the iPhone. The program is little better than random play on its lowest setting: here’s a pdn file for the first game I played against it:
[Comment "Sparring Match Between Milhouse and iPhone"] [Black "Milhouse"] [White "iPhone"] [Date "Sun Mar 21 09:25:13 PDT 2010"] [Result "1-0"] 1. 11-16 22-18 2. 10-14 24-20 3. 16-19 23x16 4. 12x19 27-23 5. 8-12 23x16 6. 12x19 26-23 7. 19x26 31x22 8. 14x23 32-27 9. 23x32 30-26 10. 4-8 28-24 11. 6-10 26-23 12. 32-28 21-17 13. 28x26 22-18 14. 9-14 18x9 15. 5x30 20-16 16. 7-11 16x7 17. 2x11 29-25 18. 30x21
Milhouse brutalized it. Checkers Free goes off the rails at this rather elementary position at move 7…
The iPhone played 31×22, which is hideous: yes, you are exchanging down, but white’s position becomes horribly pinned, and you can’t help but give up material. Milhouse sees this easily in just 5 ply search.
Addendum: Cranking the iPhone’s settings up to maximum yielded a slightly better game, although still with a fairly lop sided outcome. I didn’t bother playing this one out to the end, while White has two kings, it basically can’t prevent red from marching down and getting a truly overwhelming advantage:
[Comment "Sparring Match Between Milhouse and iPhone on Highest Level"] [Black "Milhouse"] [White "iPhone"] [Date "Sun Mar 21 10:30:56 PDT 2010"] [Result "1-0"] 1. 11-16 23-18 2. 7-11 26-23 3. 16-20 24-19 4. 11-16 22-17 5. 9-14 18x9 6. 5x14 25-22 7. 8-11 29-25 8. 11-15 28-24 9. 3-8 31-26 10. 8-11 17-13 11. 6-9 13x6 12. 2x9 22-17 13. 9-13 25-22 14. 4-8 23-18 15. 14x23 27x18 16. 16x23 26x19 17. 20x27 32x23 18. 15x24 18-14 19. 10-15 14-10 20. 24-27 10-7 21. 27-31 23-18 22. 31-27 7-2 23. 15-19 30-26 24. 27-31 18-14 25. 31-27 14-10 26. 11-16 10-7 27. 27-23 7-3 28. 23x30 17-14 29. 30-25 22-18 30. 25-22 3-7 31. 22x15 14-10 32. 15x6 2x9
A fairly interesting position occurs for white on move 10. With white to play:
Milhouse prefers 17-13, but only narrowly until the search depth approaches 20 ply, then it realizes that it might actually be a drawing move. I haven’t worked this out too much with Cake, but checking briefly, it seems that after 31 ply search, it sees the position as essentially drawn. Milhouse would take probably the better part of an hour to reach that search depth.
I suspect the world would be better if that percentage were even greater.
Apparently 15% of all web traffic is cat related. There's no reason for Brainwagon be any different.
Thanks Mal! I'm trying to reclaim the time that I was using doom scrolling and writing pointless political diatribes on…
Brainwagons back! I can't help you with a job, not least because I'm on the other side of our little…
Congrats, glad to hear all is well.