More on Chaocipher…
Well, I didn’t have much time left to work on Chaocipher last night, so I left it running on Exhibit 1. It claimed to recover a key that allowed it to match 601 characters of input, but found no better match. But it also uncovered an error in my code. It doesn’t appear that the code that I wrote to rewind the machine to find the initial settings are quite right. For instance, if I use the cipher wheel and plain wheel both set to ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ, and then encode a test message (like the first paragraph of Moshe’s announcement of the publication of the algorithm of the Chaocipher) then I get the following cipher text:
NHLBP ULNFR XRNDL IZRDO IWZSY HQCUQ XFSDE QGMPG RFUIR FQETN ZTTXI YQJJN FHFYN WWQTO SXEKX DKCXP OKOAH FPCKI XQFYF UQVMA JFKSN LGOTY KTNQJ ZNFXV ULYNO YRZQY ORVJV RUWUH HMAZA LVSIS IGLJB QAZPK NJZXO YZHPK EMBCS XGKGY YTUET VSJWK WPXKC OCYRH CNGVU RUPYZ AAFQE
which decodes to:
NINET YTWOY EARSA FTERI TSINV ENTIO NFIFT YSEVE NYEAR SAFTE RCHAL LENGE MESSA GESWE REPUB LISHE DANDA FTERM ANYCR YPTAN ALYTI CRESE ARCHE RSUNS UCCES SFULL YTRIE DTOSO LVETH ESECH ALLEN GEMES SAGES JOHNF BYRNE SCHAO CIPHE RALGO RITHM CANFI NALLY BEREV EALED
When I run my solver though, it recovers:
found a solution that exhausted the input. NPQRSTUVWXYZAOBCDEFGHIJKLM OPRSTUVW?Y?AB?CDEFGHIJ?LMN
Which is close, but no cigar. I’m not awake enough to spot my mistake yet, and it seems unlikely that I’ll get a chance to fix my error for the next few days, but I’ll try to get an hour to track down my mistake. I do think I’m 90% of the way there to recovering the key for Exhibit 1. I’m pretty confident that the solver gets the right answer, but that it is rewinding very slightly incorrectly.
Addendum: Ah, it appears I’m not quite rewinding the very last character properly. The key that I recovered is actually good for decoding, as long as you start from the second character. I’ve written this in an overly clever way. If I use my recovered key from Exhibit 1, but start at the second letter, I get something pretty reasonable:
LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTYWA LLGOO DQQUI CKBRO WNFOX ESJUM POVER LAZYD OGTOS AVETH EIRPA RTGWA DLGOO SLLIV FCRBY MHAWQ GNMSN DNCKG ZYPML AYNZL FNDOW GBJUI XZLDT NOJMT USZGI KMLCW NCKKO UICAY KSJJS SKFRG LLPUX AOXSB XAPQE CJSUS FLFTZ LNQSS WNZNT KSDGJ UUQCG QCDDW PDINF ZODLM JEXVW IFFWT EFPSZ KUATX VTKLF ZLHMV ICVDP MEZPY CULXV AXNEA YRSLB BMITU JGIIT SPIQU MUMCF WFPOS YYAWE YCKYZ QUVJB OIIUF BHXTQ FHKSE MWDBT SNJYG NIKJQ HJRRD CGCXM INUQZ GITGH TINWU ZWFXH JEWMQ DCXNB XKGYQ DDNGI AXNYR CRAMK COAIV LKLFS NVGWS QYOAO YUUWY OQACS UDFFK YXPJG TBPSZ TONZC ZPDMM OORNE VZZVA HBUPV OCUJA HCGZS LVUYI LIDGY AOOXT YDDAL JDLOU LRNQA SEZWB XPSVL EMYZT HMVAB HCIIY VHIUJ QBAUR GZEIA RUILN ZEDYB
But that predictably goes astray after (presumably) 601 characters. Not sure if the remaining issue is mine or not.
Oh well, enough for today.
I suspect the world would be better if that percentage were even greater.
Apparently 15% of all web traffic is cat related. There's no reason for Brainwagon be any different.
Thanks Mal! I'm trying to reclaim the time that I was using doom scrolling and writing pointless political diatribes on…
Brainwagons back! I can't help you with a job, not least because I'm on the other side of our little…
Congrats, glad to hear all is well.