I suspect the world would be better if that percentage were even greater.
Is this really why ham radio endures?
David Rowan of Wired.co.uk has an article over on their website:
Why ham radio endures in a world of tweets (Wired UK)
He waxes philosophically about the thrill of establishing long distance radio communication, about receiving QSL cards, and gives mention to the role that ham radio plays in time of emergency.
I hear these things repeated a lot. They aren’t false, but neither are they entirely enough of the real picture to paint a realistic view of amateur radio.
It’s wrong to think of amateur radio as a single hobby: it’s a bunch of different hobbies all united by the need for a radio license. There are radio contests. There are people who chase awards. There are people who just want QSL cards to decorate their shack. There are people who setup FM repeaters to serve their communities. There are people who operate only low power transmitters (“QRPers”) often that they construct themselves. There are people interested in space communications such as satellite or EME operation (moonbounce).
Amateur radio continues to exist because radio amateurs continue to find their own areas of interest, do the necessary work to become licensed, and then pursue those interests. Whether it is contesting, construction, serving your community in times of emergency, or just plain old talking to your neighbors, people are still finding reasons to get licensed and get on the air.
I pursue amateur radio because I’m interested in the complexity of physics that allows radio to propagate. I’m interested in construction, and experimentation. And I’m interested in finding other people with similar interests. No advances in cell phone or computer technology will really blunt that. I suspect that each ham finds his own reason to pursue it, often beyond the point where any practical economic argument.
It’s what we do for fun.
Comments
Comment from Mark VandeWettering
Time 2/4/2011 at 3:53 pm
Thanks for the comments, Rupert. I’m hoping to get a little regen receiver project working this weekend, and after that, maybe some improvements to the antenna system, now that I actually am beginning to understand the deep mysteries of antenna matching.
73 K6HX
Comment from Rupert Goodwins
Time 2/4/2011 at 11:44 am
That’s it, exactly. So many different things that are only really satisfying if you can generate and liberate a few waves – and so much freedom to do so for what’s a fairly humane process of getting a licence. And all that new technology, creating such huge amounts of processing for so little investment, opens up whole new areas. WSPR is a good case in point.
There are problems, mostly with some of the old guard who are unfortunately often the first amateurs the newcomer encounters when they start listening around: they’re only a small part of the hobby, but they affect its image. It’s immensely heartening to see so many people getting involved on the back of the make-and-fix-it-yourself movement that’s underway: all very well making your Arduino flash an LED, but once you start to get a hold of the deeply mysterious action-at-a-distance world of radio, it takes on a whole new thrill.
Rupert (aka G6HVY)