Back around 1984 or so, I first became interested in computer graphics. I was going to college at the University of Oregon, and we didn’t really have any graphics courses or any computers that you would think would be good at displaying graphics. Eventually they got a Tektronix 4115 terminal (which was huge, and cost about $20K in the day if memory serves), which I got hooked to our VAX 11/750, and I had my platform. I started to read and experiment with raytracing. Some early enthusiasm and guidance was provided over USENET by Eric Haines, who I must thank for helping inspire and inform me in those early years. Eric’s patience has shifted from being measured in Blinns to milli-Blinns now, and he’s authored a book called “Real-Time Rendering” and also maintains a very useful blog on the subject. Every once in a while, I glance over and realize that the world is changing, and I’m not keeping up. But if you want to keep up with developments, Eric’s blog will be a good place to start.

Real-Time Rendering · Tracking the latest developments in interactive rendering techniques.

I keep thinking that I should build one of these, but have never gotten around to it. Bookmarking this interesting link for future reference:

Build Your Own 3D Scanner: Optical Triangulation for Beginners.

Without further explanation, here’s Daniel White’s “Mandelbulb” formula.

(x, y, z)ⁿ = rⁿ (cos(n θ) cos(n φ), sin(n θ) cos(n φ), -sin(n φ))
r = sqrt(x² + y² + z²)
θ = atan2(y, x)
φ = atan2(z, sqrt(x²+y²))

The other day I was lucky enough to be invited by Bob Whitehill to share a lunch up at UCB with Marty Banks, Kurt Akeley and a bunch of other vision researchers from their lab. I was lucky enough once to have been interviewed by Kurt when he was at SGI back in 1994 or so. His office faced Moffett Field, and on that particular day, they were test flying Harriers. My recollection was that we spent time mostly discussing a program that he wrote in OpenGL to emulate the barrel distortion of fisheye lenses, and watching the Harriers go back and forth. I didn’t get the job offer, and Kurt had no recollection of it. Oh well. I suppose I remember that day pretty well because after my SGI interview, I went directly to a first date with the terrific lady who would later agree to marry me. October 25th, 1994.

Since I’ve been living in the bowels of Pixar production, I must admit that I haven’t been keeping up with Kurt’s doings, and it seems like that is a big mistake on my part. In trying to look up a paper that he co-authored with Marty et. al on stereo displays, I found his page at Microsoft which links to a lot of interesting material.

Archived for future digestion.

Kurt Akeley – Microsoft Research

Yep, I’m actually at the NVIDIA (why do I type NVIDIA like nVidia? everything seems to indicate that it is all caps now, I dunno) GPU Technology Conference, trying to once again get into the swing of things with respect to GPUs. Sadly, almost everything I know about computer graphics (which is actually considerable) predates the ongoing revolution that GPUs have brought to the table. We’ll see if some of this sticks this time around. For the first time, I’m beginning to grasp the functionality of current machines, and see where the evolution is going such that I feel it might be worth committing a significant fraction of my (seemingly always shrinking) store of available brain cells.

It’s about time for the 2nd day keynote by Hanspeter Pfister from Harvard, to start. I was lucky enough to serve with Hanspeter on a SIGGRAPH Sketch committee a few years back, and it seems like he’s been busy since then.

I might blog more about what’s going on here, but you might as well track what’s going on using NVIDIA’s official conference blog:

GPU Technology Conference Blog – NVIDIA.

Okay, this is a bit gruesome, but I’ve been dusting off some old papers that I never really understood on Fourier Volume Rendering, and testing my understanding by writing some simple code that takes in a volume dataset and uses the fast Fourier transform to convert it into simulated X-ray pictures. The data set that this picture was generated from was downloaded from this webpage at Stanford, and consists of CT scan data of a cadaver. The basic code works! Given a bit more work, I should be able to do arbitrary orthographic views.

The math for all this is described quite admirably by Tom Malzbender’s paper Fourier Volume Rendering.

Addendum: Here is the raw data slices:

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrwnuEtNUKc

Addendum²: Here is a link to some more interesting volume datasets.

Addendum³: Here’s my attempt at rotation. It doesn’t really work right yet. I think I understand why.

While re-reading Ren Ng’s paper on light field cameras, I saw reference to a much earlier paper by Adelson and Wang. I added it to my growing collection of Google Docs for later reference.

Single Lens Stereo with a Plenoptic Camera

A few days ago, I posted links to a couple of videos that used fractal rendering techniques. One was the Genesis effect of Star Trek 2, Wrath of Khan, the other, a 4KB demo contest entry. My intent was to show how computer graphics have evolved over the past 25 or so years. But the reason I chose the Genesis effect was that I couldn’t find an online copy of a work called Vol Libre, Loren Carpenter’s 1980 film. I bump into Loren occasionally at lunch here at Pixar and mentioned it in passing.

I don’t know if this is a coincidence, but today on facebook, he announced that he had uploaded a copy of it to Vimeo. Thanks a bunch Loren! Sit back and enjoy the vintage computer graphics from a true CG pioneer, and you’ll probably be shocked to find out how similar it is to stuff you’d see in the modern “demo scene”.

Vol Libre from Loren Carpenter on Vimeo.

It was originally my intention to compare and contrast Loren Carpenter’s Vol Libre, a mile stone in computer animation, the first film to use fractal techniques with the second video, which is a 4KB demo contest winner, but sadly, I was unable to find Vol Libre on Youtube. So, instead, I’ll compare it to the Genesis effect sequence from Star Trek (what was I thinking? Thanks Robert!) II: Wrath of Khan. After all, Loren worked on that one too.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXbWCrzWJo4

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YWMGuh15nE

What a difference a couple of decades of hardware makes, huh? I’ve managed to live through both of these periods. The field still amazes me some times.